Remembering Dr Clark

Dr Hulda Regher Clark, a pioneering biochemical physicist and naturopathic doctor, died on September 3, 2009, at the age of eighty. Dr Clark saved the lives of thousands of patients with exacting but simple protocols for most known modern diseases, including cancer and HIV/AIDS. While working with a number of plant medicines already known to assist in clearing the body of parasites, she identified just three that, when used correctly and in specific combination, could eliminate most parasites. This was important not only in the developing world, but increasingly in the developed world as well.

Dr Clark made several brilliant discoveries. The most important were these: (1) Every serious illness is associated with and can be traced to a specific parasite. (2) Each of these parasites is associated with a particular toxic metal or chemical which, when stored in the human body, provides a symbiotic “safe haven” for that organism. (3) Industrial solvents – traces of which can be found in almost all personal care products and household cleansers – enable parasites to persist in the human body, rather than being spontaneously and routinely eliminated, as was the case prior to the 1960s. It is this persistence over the long term that creates multiple deleterious effects that can ultimately destroy health.

All of the bad news from these discoveries was balanced by good news, for Dr Clark also discovered that every pathogenic organism had a signature Hertz frequency that, when transmitted electrically, would kill it. She devised an instrument called a zapper that could be set to various frequencies in order to eliminate infection or disease. Through painstaking research over many years she was led to her discovery that each organism had this signature ‘elimination’ frequency. Moreover, that the causative organism itself could be identified by the nature and symptoms of the presenting illness; and finally, that it could be cured using the appropriate frequency. The voltage needed to combat microscopic organisms was so minute that it did not disturb the human energy field or have any ill effects on the patient.

Because the liver is so central to eliminating toxins, and because detoxification is impaired when the liver itself is toxic, Dr Clark popularized a liver flush that had been used as a home remedy for generations but nearly forgotten in the modern era. The key aspects of Dr Clark’s treatments are herbal remedies, electronic zapping, and liver and gall bladder detoxification, as well as avoiding the solvents and heavy metals that led to the problem in the first place.

Readers may not be familiar with Dr Clark’s work because it has been aggressively suppressed and denounced by the pharmaceutical and medical industries along with their allies in the US government. She treated people at her low-cost clinic in Auburn, California, for many years until she was harassed into leaving the country. She thereafter moved her lab and offices to San Diego so she could maintain her clinic just over the border in Mexico. Among the hallmarks of Dr Clark’s prodigious humanitarianism are that she worked tirelessly despite threats and intimidation well into old age. She did not operate for-profit businesses; her treatment protocols, books, and tested-pure herbal products are still available at cost, for amazingly low prices in this difficult economy. Due to her inability to treat the large numbers of patients wishing to see her, she accepted only the most severe, those with end-stage terminal illness; and yet the recovery rate of those seeking treatment was above 90%. She believed in empowering health consumers and felt that less severe cases would respond well to following the protocols she made available through her books and online.

Dr Clark was dedicated to freedom of speech, expression, thought, and religion as well as freedom from suffering. This she demonstrated in death as well as life by requesting that memorial donations be made to Amnesty International, the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, and the American Civil Liberties Union. To visit her memorial website, go to  www.InMemoryOfDrHuldaClark.com.

What you can do about toxic fragrances

Toxic Fragrances versus Organics and Aromatherapy

While some devotees of cologne and perfume like their fragrances long-lasting, they may be unaware that it is phthalates – causing the disagreeable odor at the nail shop – that act as a perfume fixative, retaining the smell for 24 hours and sometimes much longer, even after clothing has been laundered in a washing machine or professionally cleaned. In fact, these same chemicals permeate the fragrance in laundry detergent, which is why it doesn’t wash away in the rinse cycle. If you find that you cannot seem to wash off fragrance from laundry detergent, fabric softener, shampoos, cologne, pump soap, dishwashing liquid, or cleaning products, you might want to change brands because you could be compromising your health. The chemicals in fabric softener sheets like Bounce are left embedded in clothing. They shorten the life of sheets and clothes, and the substance rubs off on your skin, potentially causing skin irritation and respiratory problems. Continue Reading »

Signs of Progress in Limiting Environmental Contamination, Part 3

Air “Fresheners Last month Jane Kay reported on a coalition of environmental groups petitioning the federal government to “crack down on air fresheners, products that scientific studies show can aggravate asthma and pose other health risks” (SFChron, 9/20/07).

The Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Alliance for Healthy Homes, and the National Center for Healthy Housing filed a petition with the EPA and the Consumer Product Agency to request better regulation of the industry, which is expected to garner $1.72 billion in sales this year. Excerpts from the petition:
 

Scented sprays, gels and plug-in fresheners offer no public health benefits yet contain harmful chemicals linked to breathing difficulties, developmental problems in babies and cancer in laboratory animals.

In houses, offices and restrooms, Americans suffer significant exposure to a veritable cocktail of dangerous and potentially dangerous volatile organic compounds. In cases of mold and damp indoor environments, air fresheners may hide an indicator of potentially serious health threats to the respiratory system.

Proposed truth-in-advertising labeling would require listing all ingredients in air fresheners. The government should ban ingredients that would cause allergies or appear on California’s Proposition 65 list of chemicals linked to cancer and reproductive harm.

The air fresheners can contain a number of harmful chemicals including benzene, formaldehyde, and phthalates.

Lab animal studies show that some phthalates interfere with hormonal systems, disrupt testosterone production and cause malformation of sex organs. Some studies of humans have shown a link between exposure and adverse changes in the genitals of baby boys.

 

The Natural Resource Defense Council sent 14 air fresheners to be tested for phthalates in an independent lab. The tests found that 12 products, including those marked “all natural,” contained phthalates. Continue Reading »